Quick Answer
Certain individuals who represent an issuer, and a narrow slice of individuals who represent a broker-dealer, fall outside the agent definition entirely and never have to register. Issuer-side exclusions are broad; broker-dealer-side exclusions are almost never available. Everyone stays subject to the antifraud provisions regardless.
Before diving into what agents must do after registering, you need to understand who is NOT an agent in the first place. The Uniform Securities Act (USA) builds these exclusions directly into the statutory definition of "agent."
Exclusion vs. Exemption
This is a key distinction the exam tests:
| Concept | Meaning | Registration? | Antifraud? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exclusion | The person does NOT meet the definition of "agent" at all | Never required | Still applies |
| Exemption | The person IS an agent but is relieved from the obligation to register | Waived | Still applies |
- An exclusion means the registration requirement never applies because the person falls outside the definition entirely
- An exemption means the person meets the agent definition but gets a pass on registration
- Either way, the person remains subject to the antifraud provisions of the USA
Exam Tip: Gotchas
Whether a person is excluded or exempted, the antifraud provisions ALWAYS apply. No one gets a free pass to commit fraud.
The exempt-securities exclusion is narrower than "any exempt security." It reaches only a specific list of five exempt-security categories: government securities (U.S./state/municipal and Canadian/foreign), bank/savings institution/trust company securities, commercial paper rated in one of the 3 highest rating categories, and qualified employee benefit plan securities. Other securities that are exempt from registration, such as credit union shares, insurance company securities, federal S&L securities, nonprofit organization securities, and public utility securities, do NOT qualify for this exclusion. A common exam trap: an officer of a credit union (or a building and loan association) assumes the exclusion applies because the security is exempt, but it does not, and the officer must register as an agent.
The same "narrower than it looks" trap runs through the federal covered exclusion. Only two categories count: securities sold to qualified purchasers, and securities sold in a private placement to accredited investors. Stock that is federal covered because it is listed on a national exchange does NOT support this exclusion.
Individuals Representing Issuers Who Are NOT Agents
An individual who represents an issuer is excluded from the agent definition if the individual is involved in any of the following:
| Exclusion | Details |
|---|---|
| (A) Exempt securities | Transactions in a specific, narrow list of only five exempt-security categories: government securities (U.S., state, and Canadian/foreign), bank, savings institution, and trust company securities, commercial paper rated in one of the 3 highest rating categories, and qualified employee benefit plan securities |
| (B) Exempt transactions | Transactions that are themselves exempt under the USA (for example, isolated non-issuer transactions or fiduciary transactions) |
| (C) Federal covered securities | Only two narrow categories of covered security under the Securities Act of 1933: securities sold to qualified purchasers, and securities sold in a private placement to accredited investors. Note the narrowness: a security that is federal covered because it is listed on a national exchange is NOT part of this exclusion |
| (D) Existing employees, partners, or directors | Transactions with existing employees, partners, or directors of the issuer, but only if no commission or other remuneration is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting any person in the state |
The Employee/Director Exclusion: The "No Commission" Condition
Exclusion (D) is the most heavily tested. The key condition is:
- The individual must be transacting with existing employees, partners, or directors of the issuer
- No commission or other remuneration can be paid or given (directly or indirectly) for soliciting purchases
- If the issuer pays the individual any form of compensation tied to soliciting purchases, the exclusion is destroyed
Exam Tip: Gotchas
An officer of a company who sells the company's stock to fellow employees is NOT an agent, provided the officer receives no commission or remuneration for the solicitation. If the company pays the officer a bonus for each employee who purchases shares, the exclusion is lost and the officer must register as an agent.
What counts as "remuneration for soliciting":
- Commissions per sale
- Bonuses tied to the number of employees who purchase
- Finder's fees
- Any extra compensation beyond regular salary linked to solicitation
What does NOT destroy the exclusion:
- Regular salary (not tied to solicitation)
- Standard employee benefits
Individuals Representing Broker-Dealers Who Are NOT Agents
The exclusion for broker-dealer (BD) representatives is much narrower:
- An individual representing a broker-dealer is excluded from the agent definition only if the individual's transactions in the state are limited to the narrow de-minimis transactions the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) allows for associated persons, which federal law bars states from prohibiting
- This covers an associated person of a broker-dealer that is registered in the state, where the associated person is registered with a self-regulatory organization and at least one state and is effecting transactions for the firm's existing customers (for example, a customer only temporarily present in the state, or during the limited window while the associated person's own state application is pending)
- This is a very limited exclusion. Most individuals who represent a BD in effecting securities transactions must register
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The firm must BE registered in the state, not unregistered. The federal de-minimis provision protects the associated person who is not yet registered there; it conditions that protection on the employing broker-dealer already being registered in that state. An answer choice that excuses an individual because the firm is unregistered in the state has it backwards.
- This is a transaction test, not a job-description test. The provision turns on the customer relationship (an existing account, the person assigned to it, the customer's residence or presence), not on whether the individual's duties are "clerical" or "ministerial." A purely clerical employee is outside the agent definition anyway, because they never effect or attempt to effect transactions, so they never need this exclusion.
Partners, Officers, and Directors
A partner, officer, or director of a broker-dealer or issuer (or a person performing similar functions) follows special rules:
- They are an agent only if they otherwise come within the definition, meaning they must actually be involved in effecting or attempting to effect securities transactions
- A director who only attends board meetings and has no involvement in securities transactions is NOT an agent
- A director who also solicits customer orders IS an agent
The automatic registration shortcut:
- Under the USA, registration of a broker-dealer automatically constitutes registration of any agent who is a partner, officer, or director
- So if a director IS an agent, the BD's own registration automatically covers that director. No separate agent registration filing is needed
Exam Tip: Gotchas
A director of a broker-dealer who has no involvement in effecting securities transactions is NOT an agent and does not need to register. But a director who also solicits customer orders IS an agent, though the BD's own registration automatically covers that director's agent registration.
What Should You Check on Exam Day?
- The exempt-securities exclusion covers only five named categories; credit union, insurance, federal S&L, nonprofit, and public utility securities are NOT on that list even though they are exempt from registration
- The federal-covered-securities exclusion covers only qualified-purchaser sales and accredited-investor private placements, never exchange-listed shares
- The issuer-employee exclusion survives only with zero commission or extra pay tied to soliciting
- A BD representative's exclusion is limited to the narrow federal de-minimis transaction rule; registration is otherwise the default
- Exclusion or exemption, the antifraud provisions never go away