Styles
Investment management style refers to the overarching approach a portfolio manager uses to select securities and construct portfolios. Each style carries distinct cost structures, risk profiles, and client suitability considerations. The Series 65 exam tests your ability to distinguish these styles and match them to appropriate client scenarios.
Active Management
- Goal: Outperform a benchmark index through security selection, market timing, or both
- Portfolio manager actively researches, selects, and trades individual securities
- Higher fees (management fees, transaction costs) than passive management
- Higher turnover - frequent buying and selling generates more taxable events
- Tax efficiency: Lower; high turnover creates short-term capital gains distributions
- Most actively managed funds underperform their benchmark index over long periods (after fees)
- Justified when the manager has a genuine information or analytical edge
- Common in less efficient markets (small-cap, emerging markets, high-yield bonds) where mispricing is more likely
Think of it this way: An active manager is like a chef who insists on sourcing every ingredient individually. The meal might occasionally be extraordinary, but the grocery bill is always higher, and most of the time the result is no better than a well-stocked meal kit.
Passive Management
- Goal: Match a benchmark index return, not beat it
- Buys and holds the same securities (or a representative sample) as the target index
- Lower fees than active management (minimal research and trading)
- Lower turnover = greater tax efficiency
- Based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) - if markets are efficient, consistently beating the index is unlikely
- Index funds and most ETFs use passive strategies
- Buy and hold is the simplest passive approach: purchase a diversified portfolio and hold through market cycles
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The exam often tests the cost disadvantage of active management. Even small fee differences compound significantly over time. A fund charging 1.5% vs. 0.10% must consistently outperform by 1.4% just to break even.
Active vs. Passive Comparison
| Feature | Active Management | Passive Management |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Beat the benchmark | Match the benchmark |
| Fees | Higher | Lower |
| Turnover | Higher | Lower |
| Tax efficiency | Lower | Higher |
| EMH view | Markets are inefficient | Markets are efficient |
| Typical vehicle | Actively managed mutual fund | Index fund, ETF |
Growth Investing
- Focus: Companies with above-average earnings growth potential
- P/E ratio: Typically higher; investors pay a premium for expected future growth
- Price-to-book: Higher
- Dividends: Low or none; companies reinvest earnings rather than paying dividends
- Typical sectors: Technology, biotech, innovative consumer brands
- Volatility: Higher than value stocks
- Outperforms in: Bull markets and economic expansions
Value Investing
- Focus: Companies trading below intrinsic value (undervalued)
- P/E ratio: Typically lower; the stock is priced cheaply relative to current earnings
- Price-to-book: Lower, higher dividend yields
- Companies: May be temporarily out of favor or misunderstood by the market
- Typical sectors: Financials, utilities, industrials, mature companies
- Outperforms in: Market recoveries and economic downturns
- Based on the principle of mean reversion - undervalued stocks tend to return to fair value
Think of it this way: A growth investor buys a house in a booming neighborhood expecting prices to keep rising. A value investor buys a solid house in a neglected neighborhood at a steep discount, betting that the market will eventually recognize its true worth.
Growth vs. Value Comparison
| Factor | Growth | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | Higher | Lower |
| Price-to-book | Higher | Lower |
| Dividends | Low or none | Higher yield |
| Volatility | Higher | Lower |
| Outperforms in | Bull markets / expansions | Recoveries / downturns |
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The exam may describe a client scenario and ask which style is most appropriate. Key signals: Client seeking undervalued bargains = value. Client wanting companies with rapid earnings growth = growth.
- Value stocks outperform in recessions, growth stocks outperform in expansions. This is a frequently tested distinction.
Income Investing
- Focus: Prioritizes current income (dividends, interest) over capital appreciation
- Suitable for: Retirees and investors needing regular cash flow
- Typical holdings: Bonds, dividend-paying stocks, REITs, preferred stock, utilities
- Lower growth potential but more predictable cash flows
- Subject to interest rate risk (bond prices fall when rates rise)
Think of it this way: An income investor is like a landlord who buys rental properties for the monthly rent checks, not for the hope that property values will skyrocket. The steady cash flow is the whole point.
Capital Appreciation
- Focus: Prioritizes long-term growth in portfolio value
- Accepts lower current income in exchange for higher total return potential
- Suitable for: Younger investors with long time horizons
- Typical holdings: Growth stocks, small-cap stocks, emerging markets, technology
- Higher risk/volatility than income-oriented portfolios
- May include speculative positions if appropriate for the client
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The exam may describe a client scenario and ask which style is most appropriate. Key signals: Retiree needing income = income style. Young professional saving for retirement in 30 years = capital appreciation.