Returns

Quick Answer

Total return and holding period return both use (Ending Value - Beginning Value + Income) / Beginning Value, but HPR is not annualized. Time-weighted return evaluates the manager (cash flows removed, generally required by GIPS); dollar-weighted return (commonly calculated as the internal rate of return) reflects the investor's actual experience. Sharpe ratio uses total risk (standard deviation), Treynor uses systematic risk (beta), and positive alpha means the manager beat the Capital Asset Pricing Model's prediction.

Understanding which return measure to use (and when) is one of the most frequently tested concepts in this unit. Each measure answers a slightly different question, and the exam will test whether you can match the right measure to the right situation.


Total Return

  • Total return captures all sources of investment gain: capital appreciation (or depreciation) plus income (dividends, interest)
  • Formula: (Ending Value - Beginning Value + Income) / Beginning Value
  • Most comprehensive single measure of investment performance
  • Includes both realized and unrealized gains

Example: You buy a stock at $50, receive $2 in dividends, and sell at $55. Total Return = ($55 - $50 + $2) / $50 = 14%


Holding Period Return (HPR)

  • Holding period return is the total return earned over the entire period the investment was held
  • Uses the same formula as total return: (Ending Value - Beginning Value + Income) / Beginning Value
  • Does not annualize; it simply measures the raw percentage gain or loss from purchase to sale
  • Useful for measuring the actual result of a specific investment over a defined period

Exam Tip: Gotchas

  • HPR and total return use the same formula. The key distinction is that HPR is specifically tied to the actual holding period and is not converted to an annual rate. A 30% HPR over 3 years is NOT the same as a 10% annual return.

Annualized Return

  • Converts returns over any period into an equivalent annual rate
  • Allows comparison of investments held for different time periods
  • Uses geometric (compound) averaging, not arithmetic averaging
  • Arithmetic average overstates the true compound growth rate whenever periodic returns vary (the two are equal only if every period's return is identical)

Why geometric matters: If an investment returns +50% in year one and -50% in year two, the arithmetic average is 0%. But you actually lost money: $100 becomes $150, then $75. The geometric average correctly shows the loss.

Exam Tip: Gotchas

  • Annualized return uses geometric averaging, not arithmetic. Arithmetic averaging generally overstates true compound growth whenever periodic returns vary. If asked which method produces a more accurate annualized return, the answer is geometric (compound).

Time-Weighted Return (TWR)

  • Measures the compound rate of growth of the portfolio
  • Eliminates the effect of cash flows (deposits and withdrawals the manager cannot control)
  • Preferred method for evaluating portfolio manager performance
  • Generally required by the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS); a money-weighted return is permitted instead only when the firm controls external cash flows AND the portfolio is closed-end, fixed-life, fixed-commitment, or significantly invested in illiquid assets

How it works: TWR breaks the total period into sub-periods at each cash flow point, calculates the return for each sub-period, then geometrically links them together. This isolates pure investment performance from client-driven cash flows.

When to use: Evaluating a portfolio manager's skill, comparing managers to each other, GIPS-compliant performance reporting


Dollar-Weighted Return (Money-Weighted Return)

  • Commonly calculated as the internal rate of return (IRR), one method GIPS recognizes for this purpose
  • Accounts for the timing and amount of all cash flows
  • Reflects the actual return experienced by the investor, including the impact of when they added or withdrew money
  • A large deposit before a period of strong returns will increase the dollar-weighted return relative to the time-weighted return

When to use: Evaluating an investor's personal experience, measuring the actual growth of an investor's wealth

MeasureWhat It ShowsAffected by Cash Flows?Best Used For
Time-weightedManager's skillNoEvaluating the manager
Dollar-weightedInvestor's experienceYesEvaluating the investor's actual result

Exam Tip: Gotchas

  • Time-weighted = manager evaluation. Dollar-weighted = investor's actual experience. If the question asks about evaluating a portfolio manager, the answer is generally time-weighted. If it asks about the investor's actual return, the answer is dollar-weighted (commonly the IRR).
  • GIPS generally requires time-weighted return, NOT dollar-weighted, with defined exceptions where the firm controls external cash flows AND the fund is closed-end, fixed-life, fixed-commitment, or significantly invested in illiquid assets.
  • IRR is the method commonly used to calculate dollar-weighted return for a portfolio. If the exam mentions one, you can generally substitute the other.

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

  • The discount rate that makes the net present value (NPV) of all cash flows equal to zero
  • Commonly used to calculate dollar-weighted return when applied to investment portfolios
  • Used extensively in private equity and real estate performance measurement
  • Accounts for the time value of money, unlike simple HPR

Expected Return

  • The weighted average of possible returns, where weights are the probabilities of each outcome
  • Formula: Sum of (Probability x Return) for each scenario
  • Used in portfolio construction and risk assessment (forward-looking, not historical)

Example: If there's a 40% chance of a 12% return, a 50% chance of a 6% return, and a 10% chance of a -8% return: Expected Return = (0.40 x 12%) + (0.50 x 6%) + (0.10 x -8%) = 4.8% + 3.0% + (-0.8%) = 7.0%


Risk-Adjusted Return

Two portfolios with the same return are not equal if one took significantly more risk to achieve it. Risk-adjusted measures account for this.

Sharpe Ratio

  • Formula: (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Standard Deviation of Portfolio
  • Measures excess return per unit of total risk (standard deviation)
  • Uses standard deviation as the risk measure (total risk = systematic + unsystematic)
  • Best for evaluating a portfolio that represents the investor's entire investment
  • Higher Sharpe ratio = better risk-adjusted performance

Treynor Ratio

  • Formula: (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Beta of Portfolio
  • Measures excess return per unit of systematic risk (beta)
  • Uses beta as the risk measure (systematic risk only)
  • Best for evaluating a portfolio that is one of many diversified portfolios held by the investor
  • Higher Treynor ratio = better risk-adjusted performance

Jensen's Alpha (Alpha)

  • Formula: Portfolio Return - [Risk-Free Rate + Beta x (Market Return - Risk-Free Rate)]
  • Measures the abnormal return above what the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) predicts
  • Positive alpha = portfolio outperformed its expected risk-adjusted return (manager added value)
  • Negative alpha = portfolio underperformed expectations
  • Zero alpha = portfolio performed exactly as CAPM predicted
MeasureRisk MetricBest ForWhat It Tells You
Sharpe ratioStandard deviation (total risk)Investor's only portfolioExcess return per unit of total risk
Treynor ratioBeta (systematic risk)One of many portfoliosExcess return per unit of market risk
AlphaBeta (via CAPM)Any actively managed portfolioDid the manager beat CAPM expectations?

Exam Tip: Gotchas

  • Sharpe uses standard deviation (total risk). Treynor uses beta (systematic risk). If the portfolio is well-diversified, unsystematic risk has been eliminated, so Sharpe and Treynor should give similar rankings. If the portfolio is NOT well-diversified, the rankings may differ.
  • Positive alpha means the manager beat CAPM expectations, not just that the portfolio went up. A portfolio can have a positive return but negative alpha if it underperformed what CAPM predicted for its level of risk.

Inflation-Adjusted (Real) Return

  • Nominal return adjusted for the erosion of purchasing power from inflation
  • Approximate formula: Real Return = Nominal Return - Inflation Rate
  • More accurate formula: Real Return = (1 + Nominal) / (1 + Inflation) - 1
  • Shows the actual increase in purchasing power, not just dollar value

Example: A portfolio earns 8% nominal in a year when inflation is 3%.

  • Approximate real return: 8% - 3% = 5%
  • Precise real return: (1.08 / 1.03) - 1 = 4.85%

After-Tax Return

  • Return after accounting for taxes on dividends, interest, and capital gains
  • Varies by the investor's tax bracket and the type of income received
  • Tax-deferred accounts (Traditional IRA, 401(k)): No annual tax drag; the taxable portion is generally taxed on withdrawal (after-tax contributions and qualifying rollovers are not taxed again)
  • Tax-free accounts (Roth IRA): No tax on growth or qualified withdrawals
  • Municipal bond interest: Generally exempt from federal income tax; state and local exemption typically applies only to in-state bonds. Qualified private-activity bond interest stays exempt from regular federal tax but can be an alternative minimum tax (AMT) preference item

Tax-Equivalent Yield

  • Allows comparison of tax-free and taxable investments on an equal basis
  • Formula: Tax-Equivalent Yield = Municipal Bond Yield / (1 - Tax Rate)
  • Include both federal and state tax rates when the muni is exempt from both

Example: A municipal bond yields 3.5% and the investor is in the 32% federal bracket. Tax-Equivalent Yield = 3.5% / (1 - 0.32) = 3.5% / 0.68 = 5.15%

This means a taxable bond would need to yield at least 5.15% to match the muni's after-tax return.

What Should You Check on Exam Day?

  • Total return and HPR share the same formula; HPR is just not annualized.
  • Annualized return uses geometric (compound) averaging, not arithmetic, because arithmetic generally overstates true compound growth whenever periodic returns vary.
  • Time-weighted return evaluates the manager and strips out client cash flows (generally required by GIPS); dollar-weighted return (commonly the IRR) reflects the investor's actual experience and is affected by cash-flow timing.
  • Sharpe ratio uses standard deviation (total risk) and fits an investor's entire portfolio; Treynor ratio uses beta (systematic risk) and fits one of several diversified portfolios; positive alpha means the manager beat the CAPM-predicted return, not just that the portfolio rose.
  • Real return approximates as Nominal - Inflation, or precisely as (1 + Nominal) / (1 + Inflation) - 1; tax-equivalent yield grosses up a muni's yield for comparison to a taxable bond.