Quick Answer
A registered investment company cannot change a fundamental investment policy, such as its objective, borrowing policy, or concentration policy, without a shareholder vote of a "majority" of outstanding voting securities. The same vote covers converting between open-end and closed-end, or diversified and non-diversified. The board alone cannot make these changes. The 1940 Act also requires at least 40% independent directors.
Before examining how open-end funds operate day to day, you need to understand the governance rules that control what a fund can and cannot do, and what it takes to change course.
What Does It Take to Change a Fund's Fundamental Policies?
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, a registered investment company cannot change its fundamental investment policies without a vote of a majority of outstanding voting securities.
"Majority" has a specific legal definition: the lesser of:
- 67% of shares present at a meeting where more than 50% of outstanding shares are represented, OR
- More than 50% of all outstanding shares
Fundamental policies include:
- The fund's investment objectives (growth, income, capital preservation)
- Borrowing policy (whether the fund can borrow and how much)
- Concentration policy (whether the fund can concentrate in a single industry)
- Issuing senior securities (leverage restrictions)
The same shareholder-vote requirement also applies to three structural changes:
- Changing the fund's open-end/closed-end classification
- Changing its diversified/non-diversified subclassification
- Changing the nature of its business so it ceases to be an investment company
Why does this matter? Investors buy a fund based on its stated objectives. Requiring a shareholder vote prevents fund management from dramatically changing strategy without investor consent.
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- Changing fundamental policies requires a shareholder vote. The board alone cannot make this change.
- The "majority" definition has two prongs (67% of shares present, or 50%+ of all outstanding). Whichever is lesser controls.
- A fund can't quietly convert from open-end to closed-end, or from diversified to non-diversified. Both are structural changes requiring the same shareholder vote as changing an investment objective.
What Does the Board Have to Look Like?
The board provides independent oversight of fund management:
- Under the Investment Company Act's board-composition baseline, at least 40% of the board must be non-interested persons (independent directors)
- If the fund has an investment adviser, no more than 60% of the board may be "interested persons"
- The Investment Company Act also requires the initial board to be elected by shareholders
Board responsibilities include:
- Approving the advisory contract (and renewing it annually)
- Selecting auditors
- Setting the price at which shares are offered
- Approving 12b-1 plans (distribution fees)
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The 1940 Act baseline is 40% independent directors, but many specific rules require a majority. The SEC's exemptive rules covering distribution-and-service fees and multi-class fund structures both require a majority of independent directors as a condition for reliance. The exam may test either threshold.
- The advisory contract must be renewed annually by the board or shareholders (Investment Company Act requirement).
What Should You Check on Exam Day?
- Can you list the four fundamental policies (investment objectives, borrowing policy, concentration policy, issuing senior securities) that require a shareholder vote to change, plus the three structural changes (classification, diversification status, ceasing to be an investment company) that need the same vote?
- Do you know the two-pronged "majority" definition and which prong controls when they differ (the lesser of the two)?
- Can you state the 1940 Act's 40% independent-director baseline and recognize that specific SEC exemptive rules may require a majority instead?