M&A: Buy-Side Transactions: Rapid Fire

Quick Answer

The buy-side banker confirms the acquirer can execute (strategy, resources, capacity), reviews the seller's CIM, values the target four ways (trading comps, precedent transactions, discounted cash flow, leveraged buyout), diagnoses defenses and tax structure, arranges financing, and delivers a two-step bid: a non-binding Indication of Interest, then a Letter of Intent.

The whole buy-side workflow on one sheet: capability gates, valuation, defenses, tax, financing, and bid sequence.


Which One-Liners Win Points?

  • Financial capacity is a separate test from valuation. A deal can clear the DCF model and still be infeasible if funding breaches covenants, loses investment-grade rating, or over-dilutes shareholders. Strong currency invites stock; weak currency invites cash plus debt.
  • Trading comps are a no-control-premium read; precedent transactions often reflect control value. Terminal value can materially affect a DCF output, so sensitize it. LBO output is a case-specific cross-check, not a universal floor.
  • Board approval BEFORE the ownership threshold is crossed can prevent a state statute from applying to a friendly deal (control-share, fair-price, business-combination). The reverse triangular merger is the most common structure since the target survives, preserving contracts and licenses.
  • Indication of Interest (IOI) is a RANGE, generally non-binding; Letter of Intent (LOI) is a POINT whose binding effect depends on its own language (price usually non-binding; exclusivity, break fees, confidentiality often bind).
  • A "fully financed" bid means financing is NOT a closing condition, backstopped by a bridge letter. The buy-side banker reviews the seller's CIM and confidentiality agreement; preparing the CIM is sell-side work.

Which Numbers Matter Most?

ItemValue
Business-combination statute trigger, restricted period, exceptions (Delaware is a commonly cited example, not the universal rule)statute-specific
Fair-price statute back-endhighest front-end price OR supermajority disinterested vote
Type B control requirement80%+ of target after the deal (voting stock only, no boot)
Type C boot relaxationup to 20% non-voting consideration
Reverse triangular merger voting stock80%+ acquirer voting stock
Stock-treated-as-asset (§338(h)(10)) election filing window15th day of the 9th month after the acquisition month

Thresholds, sunset periods, synergy-capture rates, control premiums, terminal-value shares, LBO structure, and credit-metric bands are statute-, plan-, or case-specific; the exam tests the framework, not a memorized universal number.

Which Gotchas Trip Students Up?

  • The poison pill trigger is BENEFICIAL ownership, not record ownership; the pill is defeasible, so a bidder who wins board control can neutralize it. A control-share statute restricts VOTING rights, not OWNERSHIP rights; thresholds are jurisdiction-specific (Ohio is a commonly cited model).
  • The fair-price statute does NOT block tender offers; it blocks the LOWER back-end leg, and a uniform-price offer clears it. Do not memorize one state's business-combination figures as universal; Delaware (15% trigger, 3-year freeze, 85%-or-more exception, two-thirds disinterested-vote exception) is well-known, but states set their own terms.
  • Type B is strict: only voting stock, no cash boot (even one dollar blows it). Type C allows up to 20% non-voting; Type A is more flexible.
  • The JOINT §338(h)(10) election is NOT available for a standalone C corporation (double taxation); only S corps and consolidated-group subsidiaries qualify. A standalone C-corp buyer may make a UNILATERAL §338(g) election.
  • Revenue synergies are less certain than cost synergies; stress-test separately rather than assuming full realization. Accretion/dilution flips on the RELATIVE earnings yield (inverse of P/E), only cleanly in the no-premium, no-synergy case.
  • Covenant compliance and rating-agency reaction are separate, binding checks; either can make a deal infeasible. Unocal and Revlon are TARGET-side duties, not the buyer's own board; Revlon is triggered by sale INEVITABILITY, not a sale offer.

How Does the Buyer Analyze, Value, and Finance the Deal?

  • Three go/no-go gates: strategy, resources, capacity. Rationale: cost synergies, revenue synergies, strategic positioning, financial engineering. Six target lenses: financial results, future prospects, market position, industry dynamics, strategic value to the buyer (BUYER-SPECIFIC), potential synergies.
  • Trading comparables: peer multiples (enterprise value to EBITDA, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; EV/sales, EV/EBIT, P/E) give a no-control-premium range. Precedent transactions often reflect control value. DCF: cash flow plus terminal value at the weighted-average cost of capital (WACC); TV = FCF_final × (1+g)/(WACC−g).
  • LBO: max price clearing the sponsor's internal rate of return (IRR) hurdle (GROSS, not net to limited partners). Pro-forma EPS = (combined net income + after-tax synergies − after-tax financing cost) / pro-forma shares.
  • Poison pill: flip-in dilutes the acquirer, flip-over dilutes into its own equity. Staggered board: only part stands each cycle. Control-share/fair-price statutes neutralize voting power and two-tier pricing; business-combination statutes delay deals with an interested stockholder.
  • Tax deferral applies only to the stock portion; boot is taxable, acquirer takes carryover basis. Continuity tests: ownership interest, business enterprise, business purpose, step-transaction. Types: A (statutory merger), B (stock-for-stock, 80%+), C (stock-for-assets, 20% boot), D (divisive), E (recapitalization), forward/reverse triangular (target survives in reverse, 80%+ voting stock).
  • The §338(h)(10) election gives a stepped-up basis. Credit metrics: debt/EBITDA, EBITDA/interest, FFO/debt. Financing menu: cash/revolver, bridge loan, term loan B, high-yield bonds, mezzanine, convertibles, equity, seller financing/earn-outs (LBO seniority: secured, subordinated, mezzanine). Diligence findings (working-capital deficit, quality-of-earnings shortfall, off-balance-sheet liabilities, customer concentration) drive price cuts or walkaway.

One-Breath Recap

The buy-side banker gates the deal on whether the acquirer can execute (strategy, resources, capacity), then reviews the seller's CIM and values the target four ways: trading comps (no control premium), precedent transactions (often control value), DCF (terminal value sensitized), and LBO (sponsor-price cross-check). The banker diagnoses defenses (prior board approval can sidestep control-share, fair-price, and business-combination statutes), coordinates tax structure (the reverse triangular merger preserves contracts; deferral rides only the stock portion), and arranges financing, converging into a two-step bid: an Indication of Interest range, then a Letter of Intent, inside the target board's Unocal/Revlon backdrop.


Need more than the recap? Read the full M&A: Buy-Side Transactions unit.