Quick Answer
The tender-offer insider trading prohibition makes it unlawful for any person who possesses material nonpublic information about a tender offer to trade in the target's securities or tip others, once substantial steps have been taken toward commencing the offer. Unlike the general anti-fraud insider trading rule, the tender-offer rule does NOT require a fiduciary breach: it operates on a pure parity-of-information principle. The net-long rule for partial tender offers prohibits tendering more shares than your net long position. The outside-purchase rule prohibits the bidder and covered persons from purchasing the subject security outside the offer from public announcement through expiration.
The tender-offer insider trading rule is conceptually the most important rule in this unit because it differs from the general anti-fraud insider trading regime in a way the exam tests directly. The net-long rule and the outside-purchase prohibition are smaller but well-tested companion rules.
The Tender-Offer Insider Trading Prohibition
The tender-offer insider trading rule, adopted by the SEC in 1980, applies once substantial steps have been taken toward commencing a tender offer (or after the offer has commenced).
It is unlawful for any person who possesses material nonpublic information relating to the offer to:
- Trade in the target's securities (or related derivatives), OR
- Tip that information to others who may trade
The information must have been acquired from:
- The offering person (bidder)
- The issuer of the subject securities (target)
- Any officer, director, partner, or employee acting on behalf of either
The rule reaches not just classic insiders but also financial printers, lawyers, bankers, dealer-managers, information agents, secretaries, and anyone else who picks up the information through a path that traces back to the bidder or target.
Why the Tender-Offer Rule Is Broader Than the General Anti-Fraud Insider Trading Regime
The conceptual difference between the tender-offer rule and the general anti-fraud insider trading regime is the most important fact in this unit.
- The tender-offer rule does NOT require a breach of fiduciary duty. It operates on the parity-of-information principle: if you have material nonpublic information about a tender offer that you got from the bidder or target chain, you must abstain.
- The general anti-fraud insider trading regime (after the Chiarella and O'Hagan cases) requires either a classical-theory fiduciary duty to shareholders OR a misappropriation breach of duty to the source of the information.
The SEC adopted the tender-offer rule in 1980 specifically to fill the gap left by Chiarella v. United States (1980), which had held that a financial-printer employee who traded on confidential takeover documents did not violate the general anti-fraud insider trading regime because he owed no fiduciary duty to the target shareholders.
Side-by-Side: Tender-Offer Insider Trading Rule vs General Anti-Fraud Regime
| Element | Tender-Offer Insider Trading Rule | General Anti-Fraud Insider Trading Regime |
|---|---|---|
| Statutory anchor | Universal anti-fraud regime, Williams Act | General Exchange Act anti-fraud (1934 Act) |
| Subject of trading | Securities of the target of a tender offer | Any security |
| Trigger | Substantial steps toward (or commencement of) a tender offer | Possession of material nonpublic information |
| Fiduciary breach required? | NO (parity-of-information) | YES (classical or misappropriation) |
| Information source | Bidder, target, or insiders of either | Any source |
| Universe of defendants | Any person possessing the information | Persons with a duty to disclose |
Think of it this way: The tender-offer rule says "if you got this from the deal chain, you can't trade." It doesn't care whether you had a fiduciary duty. The general anti-fraud regime needs the duty. The 1980 SEC rule was specifically drafted to catch Chiarella-style printer-employee fact patterns the general regime could not reach.
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The tender-offer insider trading rule does NOT require a fiduciary breach. This is the single most important conceptual difference from the general anti-fraud insider trading regime. A printer at a financial-printer firm who pieces together a pending offer from confidential documents and trades on it has no fiduciary duty to the target shareholders, so general-regime classical-theory liability was historically uncertain. The tender-offer rule catches that case directly.
- The rule is triggered by SUBSTANTIAL STEPS toward a tender offer, not just by an announced offer. If a bidder has begun talking to its board, hired bankers, and drafted offer documents, substantial steps have likely been taken.
The Net-Long Rule for Partial Tender Offers
In a partial tender offer (offer for less than all outstanding shares of the class), the net-long rule prevents a market participant from tendering more shares than they actually own.
- A person may tender only up to their net long position at both the time of tender and at the end of the proration period
- Net long position = excess of long positions over short positions in the subject security
- Designed to stop double-counting in proration: tendering more shares than you actually own to game the partial-tender proration formula
- Applies to broker-dealers as well as customer accounts
Example: A trader who is long 10,000 shares and short 4,000 shares has a net long position of 6,000 shares. The trader can tender 6,000 shares; tendering 10,000 violates the net-long rule.
The rule has been the subject of continuing SEC enforcement. FY 2019 enforcement actions confirmed the SEC's continuing focus on net-long violations.
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The net-long rule prohibits tendering more shares than your NET LONG position. A market participant who is short the stock cannot count those short shares against the tender. Long 10,000 / short 4,000 = net long 6,000; that is the maximum you can tender.
- The rule applies to broker-dealers AND customer accounts. A broker-dealer cannot facilitate a customer's over-tender any more than it can over-tender on its own behalf.
The Outside-Purchase Prohibition
The outside-purchase rule prohibits the bidder and other covered persons from buying the subject security outside the tender offer during the offer window.
- From the public announcement of the offer until expiration, a "covered person" may not directly or indirectly purchase or arrange to purchase the subject securities or related securities, except as part of the tender offer
- The rule closes an end-run where the bidder runs a low-price tender and then mops up additional shares in the open market for less
Who Is a Covered Person?
Covered persons include:
- The bidder and its affiliates
- The dealer-manager and its affiliates
- Advisors paid contingent on completion of the offer
- Any person acting in concert with the foregoing
Limited exceptions exist for certain dealer-manager hedging and basket transactions, and there is class relief for cross-border offers where US holders are 10% or less of the class.
Exam Tip: Gotchas
- The outside-purchase rule prohibits the bidder (AND dealer-managers, advisors, and persons acting in concert with them) from buying the subject security OUTSIDE the offer during the offer window. This forecloses the end-run where the bidder runs a low-price tender and then mops up additional shares in the open market for less.
- The covered-persons definition is broad. It captures the bidder's advisors and anyone acting in concert with the bidder, not just the bidder itself.